Extricating short-duration and bold-grained high-yielding soybean genotypes under waterlogging conditions

Mafruha Akter; M. Abdullah Al Mamun; Munny Akter; M. Abdul Baset Mia; M. Abdul Karim

doi:10.14232/abs.2024.2.124-141

Authors

Mafruha Akter Gazipur Agricultural University , Department of Agronomy
M. Abdullah Al Mamun Gazipur Agricultural University , Department of Agronomy
Munny Akter Gazipur Agricultural University , Department of Agronomy
M. Abdul Baset Mia Gazipur Agricultural University , Department of Crop Botany https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7272-6017
M. Abdul Karim Gazipur Agricultural University , Department of Agronomy

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14232/abs.2024.2.124-141

Keywords:

bold grain, short duration, tolerance, waterlogging

Abstract

Two experiments were conducted at BSMRAU, Gazipur, during 2021 and 2022 to analyze the effects of waterlogging (WL) on the performance of short-duration, bold-seeded soybean genotypes and assess the impact on seed quality. In 2021, twelve genotypes—BD2334, G00113, G00164, G00064, G00221, BD2331, G00138, G00321, G00058, G00060, G00025, and BU Soybean-1—were evaluated under control and WL conditions. In 2022, five selected genotypes (BD2334, G00164, BD2331, G00060, and BU Soybean-1) were assessed. Plants were subjected to WL stress for seven days in 2021 and five days in 2022 during the pod formation stage. A split-plot design with three replications was employed. Waterlogging stress significantly reduced yield, yield attributes, SPAD value, photosynthesis rate, photosynthetic pigments, transpiration rate, stomatal conductance, germination rate, and early seedling growth. However, it increased electrolyte leakage in seeds as well as proline and malondialdehyde content in leaves. Waterlogged plants matured earlier than their respective control plants. Genotypic differences in WL tolerance were evident, with BD2334, G00164, G00221, and BD2331 exhibiting better yield performance under WL stress. Genotype G00060 demonstrated higher tolerance to WL based on specific physiological parameters. These findings suggest that these genotypes may be suitable for further field evaluation to identify WL-tolerant soybean varieties.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aggarwal PK, Kalra N, Chander S, Pathak H (2006) Info-Crop: a dynamic simulation model for the assessment of crop yields, losses due to pests, and environmental impact of agro-ecosystems in tropical environments. I. Model description. Agril Sys 89(1):1-25.

Agrawal RL (2005) Seed Technology. Oxford and IBH Publishing Co. Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi, India. pp. 565-590.

Akter M, Akter M, Mamun MAA, Karim MA (2021) Waterlogging effect on short duration soybean genotypes: phenology and greenness. Ecology J 3(2):169-173.

Al-Naggar A, Lee MH, Hur J, Lee YH, Igalavithana AD, Shaheen SM, Ryu C, Rinklebe J, Tsang DCW, Ok YS (2020) Biochar-induced metal immobilization and soil biogeochemical process: an integrated mechanistic ap-proach. Sci. Total Environ 698:134112.

Andales AA, Batchelor WD, Anderson CE, Farnham DE, Whigham DK (2000) Incorporating tillage effects into a soybean model. Agril Sys 66(2):69-98.

Asseng S, Cao W, Zhang W, Ludwig F (2009) Crop physiology, modelling and climate change: impact and adaptation strategies. In Crop Physiology: Applications for Genetic Improvement and Agronomy. Elsevier, p p . 511-5 4 3 .

Bates LS, Waldren R A, Teare ID (1973) Rapid determination of free proline for water-stress studies. Plant Soil 39:205-207.

Collaku A, Harrison SA (2002) Losses in wheat due to wa-terlogging. Crop Sci 42(2):444-450.

Da-Silva CJ, do Amarante L (2020) Short-term nitrate sup-ply decreases fermentation and oxidative stress caused by waterlogging in soybean plants. Environ Exp Bot 176:10 4 0 78 .

FAOSTAT (2022) Food and Agriculture Organization (www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/qc).

FRG (2018) Fertilizer Recommendation Guide-2018. Ban-gladesh Agricultural Research Council, Dhaka.

Garcia N, da-Silva CJ, Cocco KLT, Pomagualli D, de Oliveira FK, da Silva JVL, de Oliveira ACB, do Amarante L (2020) Waterlogging tolerance of five soybean geno-types through different physiological and biochemical mechanisms. Environ Exp Bot 172:103975.

Gómez E, Gomez-Viilegas MA, Marín JM (1998) A multi-variate generalization of the power exponential family of distributions. Comm Stat Theory Meth 27(3):589-600.

Hartman GL, West ED, Herman TK (2011) Crops that feed the World 2. Soybean worldwide production, use, and constraints caused by pathogens and pests. Food Sec 3 : 5 -17.

Heath RL, Packer L (1968) Photoperoxidation in isolated chloroplasts: I. Kinetics and stoichiometry of fatty acid peroxidation. Arch Biochem Biophys 125(1):189-198.

Hossain MS, Mamun MAA, Khaliq QA, Higuchi H, Nawata E, Karim MA (2019) Waterlogging induced changes in morpho-physiology of soybean. Trop Agril Res 1:53-54.

IRRI (2002) International Rice Research Institute, Manila, Philippines, Standard Evaluation System, for Rice.

ISTA (2019) International Seed Testing Association. Available online: https://www.seedtest.org/en/home.html (accessed on 31 January 2019).

Jin-Woong CHO, Ji HC, Yamakawa T (2006) Comparison of photosynthetic response of two soybean cultivars to soil flooding. J Fac Agril Kyushu Univ 51(2):227-232.

Jitsuyama Y (2017) Hypoxia-responsive root hydraulic conductivity influences soybean cultivar-specific wa-terlogging tolerance. Am J Plant Sci 8(04):770.

Kaur G, Singh G, Motavalli PP, Nelson KA, Orlowski JM, Golden BR (2020) Impacts and management strategies for crop production in waterlogged or flooded soils: A review. Agron J 112(3):1475-1501.

Konnerup D, Toro G, Pedersen O, Colmer TD (2018) Water-logging tolerance, tissue nitrogen and oxygen transport in the forage legume Melilotus siculus: a comparison of nodulated and nitrate-fed plants. Ann Bot 121(4):699-709.

Lapaz ADM, de Camargos LS, Yoshida CHP, Firmino AC, de Figueiredo PAM, Aguilar JV, Nicolai AB, de Paiva WDS, Cruz VH, Tomaz RS (2020) Response of soybean to soil waterlogging associated with iron excess in the reproductive stage. Physiol Mol Biol Plants 26:1635-1648.

Lichtenthaler HK (1987) Chlorophylls and carotenoids: pigments of photosynthetic bio membranes. Methods Enzymol 148:350-382.

Mamun MAA, Shultana R, Rana MM, Mridha AJ (2013) Economic threshold density of multi species weed for direct seeded rice, Asian J Agri Rural Dev 3(8):523-531.

Mamun MAA, Haque MM, Khaliq QA, Karim MA, Karim AJMS, Mridha AJ, Saleque MA (2015) Assessment of soil chemical properties and rice yield in tidal submergence ecosystem. Bangladesh Agron J 18(2):79–87.

Mamun MA A, Haque MM, Saleque MA, Khaliq QA, Karim AJMS, Karim MA (2018) Evaluation of different fertil-izer management guidelines for boro rice cultivation in south central coastal region of Bangladesh. Ann Agra Sci 16(4):466–475.

Mamun MAA, Julekha, Sarker U, Mannan MA, Rahman MM, Karim MA, Ercisli S, Marc R A, Golokhvast KS (2022) Application of potassium after waterlogging improves quality and productivity of soybean seeds. Li fe 12:1816.

Manzur ME, Grimoldi AA, Insausti P, Striker GG (2009) Escape from water or remain quiescent Lotus tenuischanges its strategy depending on depth of submergence. Ann Bot 104 (6):1163 -1169.

Maranna S, Nataraj V, Kumawat G, Chandra S, Rajesh V, Ramteke R, Patel RM, Ratnaparkhe BM, Hussain SM, Gupta S, Khandekar N (2021) Breeding for higher yield, early maturity, wider adaptability and waterlogging tolerance in soybean (Glycine max L.): A case study. Sci Rep 11(1):22853.

Maryam A, Nasreen S (2012) A review: water logging ef-fects on morphological, anatomical, physiological and biochemical attributes of food and cash crops. Int J Water Res Env Sci 1(4):113-120.

Messina CD, Jones JW, Boote KJ, Vallejos CE (2006) A gene-based model to simulate soybean development and yield responses to environment. Crop Sci 46(1):456-466.

Peng S, Chen L, Qin JG, Hou J, Yu N, Long Z, Ye J, Sun X (2007) Effects of replacement of dietary fish oil by soy-bean oil on growth performance and liver biochemical composition in juvenile black seabream, Acanthopagrus schlegeli. Aquacult 276(1-4):154-161.

Polischuk R A, Miralles DJ, Striker GG (2022) A quantitative review of soybean responses to waterlogging: Agro-nomical, morpho-physiological and anatomical traits of tolerance. Plant Soil 475(1-2):237-252.

Rhine MD, Stevens G, Shannon G, Wrather A, Sleper D (2010) Yield and nutritional responses to waterlogging of soybean cultivars. Irri Sci 28:135-142

Rocío AP, Miralles DJ, Colmer TD, Polischuk EL, Striker GG (2018) Waterlogging of winter crops at early and late stages: impacts on leaf physiology, growth and yield. Front Plant Sci 9:1863.

Satter MA, Rahman MA, Rashid HU, Ali MS, Alom MS (2005) Krishi Projukti Hatboi (Handbook on Agro-technology), Bangladesh Agricultural Research Institute 25:14 4 -151.

Sun J, Yang L, Zhao F, Wu W (2020) Domestic dynamics of crop production in response to international food trade: evidence from soybean imports in China. J Land Use Sci 15(1):91-98.

Sun M, Zhao K, Wang J, Mu W, Zhan Y, Li W, Teng W, Zhao X, Han Y (2022) Identification of quantitative trait loci underlying lodging of soybean across multiple environ-ments. Crop Pasture Sci 73(6):652-662.

Twum LA, Ocloo FC, Duah-Bisiw D, Odai BT (2021) De-termining the effect of heat treatment on iron fortified soybean gari blend and its potential bioavailability. Sci Afr 12:e00763.

USDA (2022) United States Department of Agriculture. https://ipad.fas.usda.gov/countrysummary/default.aspx?id=BG&crop=Soybean

Wu C, Mozzoni LA, Moseley D, Hummer W, Ye H, Chen P, Shannon G, Nguyen H (2020) Genome-wide association mapping of flooding tolerance in soybean. Mole Breed 4 0 :1-14 .

Wu C, Zeng A, Chen P, Hummer W, Mokua J, Shannon JG, Nguyen HT (2017) Evaluation and development of flood-tolerant soybean cultivars. Plant Breed 136(6):913-923.

Wuebker EF, Mullen RE, Koehler K (2001) Flooding and temperature effects on soybean germination. Crop Sci 41(6):1857-1861.

Yaklich RW, Abdul-Baki AA (1975) Variability in Metabolism of Individual Axes of Soybean Seeds and Its Relationship to Vigor 1. Crop Sci 15(3):424-426.

Zeng H, Zhang Y, Zhang X, Pi E, Zhu Y (2017) Analysis of EF-hand proteins in soybean genome suggests their potential roles in environmental and nutritional stress signaling. Front Plant Sci 8:877.